CCR: Question #1: Research
Question #1: How does your product use or challenge conventions and how does it represent social groups or issues?
Generally speaking, I am nearly complete shooting my project known as Stay Inside and transition to editing. At this point I must begin my Creative Critical Reflection, or CCR, to add to my Cambridge portfolio. It is simply a matter of looking back to how I had thought about the entire affair, both in planning and final cut, and it has to be an actual, artistic response to four huge questions.The question I am discussing in this post is Question 1, how my movie creates and/or dismantles old notions and what it says about various groups or problems. In my notes, I remembered that I must discuss some thriller conventions, provide examples, and tell why I decided to flip some of them or retain them.I dug deep into the aspects of a thriller when I embarked on the research. The elements that present themselves in the predominance are a very serene and lonely environment, low-key lighting and the characters are completely defenseless or unaware of a threat that is simply waiting. In the Stay inside I did all of that by setting the entire situation in a small, empty house and only applying a long and wide shot to indicate that there is nothing to help Jay and Marcus out there. I also borrowed the films such as The Ring and The Others which are the traditional domestic intrusions. The stranger comes to the door when the guys are distracted so that is as close as the safe place gets broken. I retained that conventional aspect since it does indeed stand out and frightens the viewer on the first image.
However, when I began to watch the characters I chose to do something different. The central individuals are on the go in most thrillers before the horror strikes. I turned Jay and Marcus into complete slackers. I got some of this vibe of Beavis and Butt-Head, Pizza boxes all over, candy on the coffee table and clutter in the living room. The entire idea was to depict them completely unplugged to reality in order to make the broadcast and the door knock even more shocking on them. Switching that stereotypical rule with the other provides the film with a sense of a dark comedy and a real tension.
The other group of people in the movie is the youthful loitering populace. The children who are constantly neglected are Jay and Marcus whose physical looks suggest that they were identical to ordinary people but are actually living in different worlds. They are dressed in normal clothes this way Jay in grey and Marcus in black hoodie and blue jeans, so they are not distinguished in the group.That allows me to play the underdog effect. The audience applauds since they too are in a scenario that is very relatable, and they pull together how the noisy, distracted mentality of the present generation youth can actually be a threat. That is what I would like to discuss how you normally see it does not look.














